RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04811
	 XXXXXXXX	COUNSEL: NONE
			HEARING DESIRED: NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  The overall rating and closeout date for his Enlisted 
Performance Report (EPR) for the period 1 June 2009 through 31 May 
2010, be updated in the Personnel Data System (PDS) to reflect 
“5B-31 May 2010.”

2.  His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 26 February 2013, be 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Due to administrative reasons, the aforementioned EPR is not 
loaded in the PDS and should be updated to reflect an overall 
rating and close-out date of “5B-31 May 2010.”

According to his AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and 
Intervention Processing, a medical evaluation revealed he had 
stage 3 kidney failure that precluded him from obtaining a passing 
score.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of an AF 
Form 77, Letter of Evaluation and AF Form 108.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 13 May 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.

AF Form 108, Section III, Request for Medical Evaluation, dated 
12 April 2013, indicates the applicant has stage 3 kidney disease.

The AF Form 77 entered into the Automated Records Management 
System (ARMS) reflects, "Report for the period 1 Jun 2009 through 
31 May 2010 is not available for administrative reasons.  The PDS 
contains the following overall rating and close-out date 
pertaining to the missing report: “5B, 31 May 2010."


?
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID states that the corrective action requested by the 
applicant pertaining to his EPR has been resolved through 
pertinent administrative procedures.  Therefore, it does not 
require referral to the Board.  The re-accomplished AF Form 
77 will be sent to the ARMS.

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove 
the contested FA from the AFFMS.  Under normal circumstances, when 
the Primary Care Manager (PCM) determines a medical condition 
exists that precludes a member from passing the FA, the PCM 
provides specific limitations.  There is nothing in the evidence 
that reflects which components precluded the applicant from 
satisfactorily completing the FA.  In accordance with AFI 36-2905, 
Air Force Fitness Program, "all members will complete an abdominal 
circumference assessment unless exempted by medical provider."  
Simply stated, without identifying specific limitations, there is 
insufficient evidence to indicate the FA should be invalidated.  

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 22 September 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit E).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations 
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, aside 
from the administrative correction to his record, we find no basis 
to recommend granting the additional relief sought in this 
application.



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 21 October 2014, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

       , Panel Chair
       , Member
       , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2013-
04811 was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Forms 149, dated 30 September 2013, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 13 July 2014, w/atch. 
      Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 28 August 2014.
      Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 September 2014.